Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann
642 N.E.2d 347, 71 Ohio St. 3d 101
Opinion
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann, 642 N.E.2d 347, 71 Ohio St. 3d 101 (Ohio 1994).
642 N.E.2d 347 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Speros
1995 Ohio 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Speros
652 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)