Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann

642 N.E.2d 347, 71 Ohio St. 3d 101
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1994
DocketNo. 94-1813
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 642 N.E.2d 347 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann, 642 N.E.2d 347, 71 Ohio St. 3d 101 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Speros
1995 Ohio 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Speros
652 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 N.E.2d 347, 71 Ohio St. 3d 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-schumann-ohio-1994.