Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sangiamo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sangiamo

806 A.2d 849

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 25, 2002

DocketNo. 652 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 806 A.2d 849 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sangiamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sangiamo, 806 A.2d 849 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 31, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that TONY SANTO SAN-GIAMO, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for 20 months, retroactive to March 12, 2001, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 31, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that TONY SANTO SAN-GIAMO, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for 20 months, retroactive to March 12, 2001, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 A.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-sangiamo-pa-2002.