Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo

487 N.E.2d 296, 21 Ohio St. 3d 15, 21 Ohio B. 278, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 2, 1986·No. D.D. No. 85-24·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo, 487 N.E.2d 296, 21 Ohio St. 3d 15, 21 Ohio B. 278, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514 (Ohio 1986).

487 N.E.2d 296 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related