Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo

487 N.E.2d 296, 21 Ohio St. 3d 15, 21 Ohio B. 278, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 2, 1986

DocketD.D. No. 85-24

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 487 N.E.2d 296 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo, 487 N.E.2d 296, 21 Ohio St. 3d 15, 21 Ohio B. 278, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514 (Ohio 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI