Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo
487 N.E.2d 296, 21 Ohio St. 3d 15, 21 Ohio B. 278, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514
Opinion
Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).
Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo, 487 N.E.2d 296, 21 Ohio St. 3d 15, 21 Ohio B. 278, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514 (Ohio 1986).
487 N.E.2d 296 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
L.J. Smith, Inc. v. Harrison Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)
2014 Ohio 2872 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)