Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw

700 N.E.2d 858, 83 Ohio St. 3d 462
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1998
DocketNo. 98-384
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 700 N.E.2d 858 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw, 700 N.E.2d 858, 83 Ohio St. 3d 462 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As we said in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100, 694 N.E.2d 897, 899, “The continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases.” We find no mitigating circumstances here that would justify an exception to that principle. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nagorny
105 Ohio St. 3d 97 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Young
2000 Ohio 160 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Roberts
1999 Ohio 196 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roberts
715 N.E.2d 1138 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Mazzocco
1999 Ohio 277 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Mazzocco
709 N.E.2d 114 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw
1998 Ohio 25 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 N.E.2d 858, 83 Ohio St. 3d 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-romaniw-ohio-1998.