Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roetzel
639 N.E.2d 50, 70 Ohio St. 3d 376
This text of 639 N.E.2d 50 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roetzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roetzel, 639 N.E.2d 50, 70 Ohio St. 3d 376 (Ohio 1994).
Opinion
We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with no credit given for time served since November 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Weisberg
2010 Ohio 142 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
639 N.E.2d 50, 70 Ohio St. 3d 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-roetzel-ohio-1994.