Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roetzel

639 N.E.2d 50, 70 Ohio St. 3d 376
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 1994·No. No. 94-971·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with no credit given for time served since November 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roetzel, 639 N.E.2d 50, 70 Ohio St. 3d 376 (Ohio 1994).

639 N.E.2d 50 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Roetzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Weisberg
2010 Ohio 142 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)