Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rodney

886 A.2d 665
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
DocketNo. 743 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 886 A.2d 665 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rodney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rodney, 886 A.2d 665 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2005, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated September 23, 2005, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Wayne Anthony Rodney is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day consecutive to the suspension ordered by this Court on June 13, 2002, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
886 A.2d 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-rodney-pa-2005.