Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rocker

85 Ohio St. 3d 397, 1999 WL 253116
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2687
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 Ohio St. 3d 397 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rocker, 85 Ohio St. 3d 397, 1999 WL 253116 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. “[P]ermanent disbarment is an appropriate sanction for conduct that violates DR 1-102 and results in a felony conviction.” Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 51, 52, 693 N.E.2d 1078, 1079. In fact, permanent disbarment is the only appropriate sanction for an attorney convicted of murder. See, e.g., Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v. Steele (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 1, 19 O.O.3d 120, 417 N.E.2d 104 (attorney convicted of first-degree murder of his wife disbarred); Columbus Bar Assn. v. Riebel (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 106, 554 N.E.2d 1318 (attorney convicted of several crimes, including five counts of attempted murder with a deadly weapon, disbarred). Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rocker
1999 Ohio 401 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Ohio St. 3d 397, 1999 WL 253116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-rocker-ohio-1999.