Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson

699 N.E.2d 931, 83 Ohio St. 3d 319

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 30, 1998

DocketNo. 98-720

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 699 N.E.2d 931 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson, 699 N.E.2d 931, 83 Ohio St. 3d 319 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months; however, the entire six-month suspension is stayed, provided that respondent complete a two-year probationary period, under a monitor selected by relator, upon the conditions set forth by the board in its report, and upon the further condition that, during the probationary period, respondent satisfy the malpractice judgment against him in the amount of $33,016.75. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months; however, the entire six-month suspension is stayed, provided that respondent complete a two-year probationary period, under a monitor selected by relator, upon the conditions set forth by the board in its report, and upon the further condition that, during the probationary period, respondent satisfy the malpractice judgment against him in the amount of $33,016.75. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 N.E.2d 931, 83 Ohio St. 3d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-robinson-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack