Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Retos

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Retos

630 A.2d 1218, 534 Pa. 259

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 8, 1993

DocketNo. 960 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board No. 57 DB 93

StatusPublished

This text of 630 A.2d 1218 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Retos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Retos, 630 A.2d 1218, 534 Pa. 259 (Pa. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 1993, there having been filed with this Court by George Retos, Jr., his verified Statement of Resignation dated July 15, 1993, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of George Retos, Jr., be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ., did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 1993, there having been filed with this Court by George Retos, Jr., his verified Statement of Resignation dated July 15, 1993, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of George Retos, Jr., be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ., did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

630 A.2d 1218, 534 Pa. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-retos-pa-1993.