Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing

559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 265, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 12, 1990
DocketNo. 90-403
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 559 N.E.2d 1359 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing, 559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 265, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert
2011 Ohio 5935 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kodish
110 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler
851 N.E.2d 502 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore
804 N.E.2d 423 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 265, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-ressing-ohio-1990.