Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing
559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 265, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045
Opinion
We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing, 559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 265, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045 (Ohio 1990).
559 N.E.2d 1359 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert
2011 Ohio 5935 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kodish
110 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler
851 N.E.2d 502 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore
804 N.E.2d 423 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)