Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall

539 N.E.2d 160, 43 Ohio St. 3d 149, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 96
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 7, 1989·No. No. 89-50·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Prior to reinstatement, consideration is to be given to the respondent’s mental condition. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall, 539 N.E.2d 160, 43 Ohio St. 3d 149, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 96 (Ohio 1989).

539 N.E.2d 160 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pansiera
1997 Ohio 93 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pansiera
674 N.E.2d 1373 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)