Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pincus
This text of 656 N.E.2d 1280 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pincus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct. We also agree with its recommendation, but with some modification.
Under Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A), attorneys in this state are subject to an automatic interim suspension from the practice of law upon conviction of a felony; however, in respondent’s case, no order of interim suspension was ever issued.1 Notwithstanding this, respondent stopped practicing law voluntarily at least as of his sentencing in December 1993 because he no longer trusted his commitment to his clients or his judgment on their behalf. For this reason, we are inclined to temper the indefinite suspension we agree is appropriate for respondent’s misconduct and allow credit for his self-imposed interim suspension from the date of his sentencing.
[149]*149Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio, but he is granted credit for the time of his voluntary interim suspension from December 17, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
656 N.E.2d 1280, 74 Ohio St. 3d 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-pincus-ohio-1995.