Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pierre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pierre

897 A.2d 1162, 587 Pa. 129, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 735

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 28, 2006·No. No. 1113 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 21, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Alex Hugues Pierre be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, to run concurrent with the suspension ordered by this court on August 30, 2005, at No. 1047 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 21, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Alex Hugues Pierre be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, to run concurrent with the suspension ordered by this court on August 30, 2005, at No. 1047 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pierre, 897 A.2d 1162, 587 Pa. 129, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 735 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

897 A.2d 1162 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pierre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related