Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby

739 N.E.2d 346, 90 Ohio St. 3d 455

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2000·No. No. 00-1100·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record in this matter, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we believe that respondent should be and he hereby is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would suspend respondent for two years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record in this matter, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we believe that respondent should be and he hereby is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would suspend respondent for two years.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby, 739 N.E.2d 346, 90 Ohio St. 3d 455 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

739 N.E.2d 346 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Oglesby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related