Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris

707 N.E.2d 507, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1203

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Ohio St. 3d 93 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1999·No. No. 95-2525·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent David W. Norris, Attorney Registration No. 0021394, last known business address in Westlake, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of July 24, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year of the suspension stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that David W. Norris be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 93, 666 N.E.2d 1087.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent David W. Norris, Attorney Registration No. 0021394, last known business address in Westlake, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of July 24, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year of the suspension stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that David W. Norris be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 93, 666 N.E.2d 1087.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris, 707 N.E.2d 507, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1203 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

707 N.E.2d 507 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related