Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nissenbaum

452 A.2d 1020, 499 Pa. 224, 1982 Pa. LEXIS 622
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 10, 1982
StatusPublished

This text of 452 A.2d 1020 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nissenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nissenbaum, 452 A.2d 1020, 499 Pa. 224, 1982 Pa. LEXIS 622 (Pa. 1982).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

There having been issued by this Court a Rule dated February 26, 1982, to show cause why SAMUEL C. NISSENBAUM should not be disbarred from the practice of law, upon consideration of the briefs filed and oral argument presented, it is

ORDERED that the Rule be and is hereby discharged; and it is further

ORDERED that the said SAMUEL C. NISSENBAUM be and is hereby SUSPENDED from the Bar of the Commonwealth for a period of five (5) years commencing June 9, 1978, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

LARSEN, FLAHERTY and HUTCHINSON, JJ., would disbar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 A.2d 1020, 499 Pa. 224, 1982 Pa. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-nissenbaum-pa-1982.