Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng

Hawaii Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 2013·No. SCAD-12-0000414·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000414 18-MAR-2013 01:50 PM SCAD-12-0000414

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

WING C. NG, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 09-002-8725)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ. and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Ginoza, assigned by reason of vacancy)

On March 8, 2013, Respondent Wing C. Ng filed with this court a document entitled “Request for Reconsideration; Request for Clarification; Previous Reply to ODC.” Though Respondent Ng fails to cite to any authority for the filing, we deem it a motion for reconsideration, timely made pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 18, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000414 18-MAR-2013 01:50 PM SCAD-12-0000414

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

WING C. NG, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 09-002-8725)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ. and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Ginoza, assigned by reason of vacancy)

On March 8, 2013, Respondent Wing C. Ng filed with this court a document entitled “Request for Reconsideration; Request for Clarification; Previous Reply to ODC.” Though Respondent Ng fails to cite to any authority for the filing, we deem it a motion for reconsideration, timely made pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 18, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng, (haw 2013).

Pincite

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.