Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass

602 N.E.2d 610, 65 Ohio St. 3d 160, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 9, 1992
DocketNo. 92-1709
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 602 N.E.2d 610 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass, 602 N.E.2d 610, 65 Ohio St. 3d 160, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886 (Ohio 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scott (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 5194 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 N.E.2d 610, 65 Ohio St. 3d 160, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-nass-ohio-1992.