Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass

602 N.E.2d 610, 65 Ohio St. 3d 160, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 1992·No. No. 92-1709·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass, 602 N.E.2d 610, 65 Ohio St. 3d 160, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886 (Ohio 1992).

602 N.E.2d 610 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scott (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 5194 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)