Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Myers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Myers

718 A.2d 298, 553 Pa. 143, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2284

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 15, 1998

DocketNo. 464 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 718 A.2d 298 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Myers, 718 A.2d 298, 553 Pa. 143, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2284 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 1998, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from disability by reason of mental infirmity or illness which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to complaints of professional misconduct brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 38 DB 98 and Office of Disciplinary Counsel File No. C4-97-609, it is hereby

ORDERED that J. Kenneth Myers’ status be immediately modified from inactive status pursuant to Rule 219(i), Pa. R.D.E., to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony and any further proceedings necessary pursuant to Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 1998, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from disability by reason of mental infirmity or illness which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to complaints of professional misconduct brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 38 DB 98 and Office of Disciplinary Counsel File No. C4-97-609, it is hereby

ORDERED that J. Kenneth Myers’ status be immediately modified from inactive status pursuant to Rule 219(i), Pa. R.D.E., to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony and any further proceedings necessary pursuant to Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 A.2d 298, 553 Pa. 143, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-myers-pa-1998.