Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca

669 A.2d 879

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 20, 1995

DocketNo. 164 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Disciplinary Board No. 147 DB 95

StatusPublished

This text of 669 A.2d 879 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Muraca, 669 A.2d 879 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 1995, there having been filed with this Court by Frank John Muraca his verified Statement of Resignation dated October 16, 1995, stating that he desires to resign ¡from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Frank John Muraca be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

[880]*880MONTEMURO, J., participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.J.A. 701(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 1995, there having been filed with this Court by Frank John Muraca his verified Statement of Resignation dated October 16, 1995, stating that he desires to resign ¡from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Frank John Muraca be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

[880]*880MONTEMURO, J., participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.J.A. 701(f).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 A.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-muraca-pa-1995.