Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mullen

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mullen

652 N.E.2d 978, 73 Ohio St. 3d 295

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 1995·No. No. 95-765·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspend[297]*297ed indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio and shall receive no credit for the suspension of his license since October 15, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspend[297]*297ed indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio and shall receive no credit for the suspension of his license since October 15, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mullen, 652 N.E.2d 978, 73 Ohio St. 3d 295 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

652 N.E.2d 978 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related