Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount

799 N.E.2d 161, 100 Ohio St. 3d 1244

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 14, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-1274

StatusPublished

This text of 799 N.E.2d 161 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount, 799 N.E.2d 161, 100 Ohio St. 3d 1244 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} On September 26, 2002, this court reciprocally suspended respondent, Dick Wilson Mount Jr., for one year, stayed the suspension, and placed respondent on probation for a period of one year with the condition that he could not apply for termination of probation in Ohio until his probation was terminated in the state of Florida. On September 29, 2003, respondent applied for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated September 26, 2002.

{¶ 2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, Dick Wilson Mount Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0037553, last known business address in Minerva, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

{¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 4} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount, 97 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2002-Ohio-5446, 776 N.E.2d 492.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} On September 26, 2002, this court reciprocally suspended respondent, Dick Wilson Mount Jr., for one year, stayed the suspension, and placed respondent on probation for a period of one year with the condition that he could not apply for termination of probation in Ohio until his probation was terminated in the state of Florida. On September 29, 2003, respondent applied for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated September 26, 2002.

{¶ 2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, Dick Wilson Mount Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0037553, last known business address in Minerva, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

{¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 4} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount, 97 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2002-Ohio-5446, 776 N.E.2d 492.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

799 N.E.2d 161, 100 Ohio St. 3d 1244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-mount-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack