Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morford

545 N.E.2d 1254, 46 Ohio St. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 269
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1989
DocketNo. 89-1101
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 545 N.E.2d 1254 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morford, 545 N.E.2d 1254, 46 Ohio St. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 269 (Ohio 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morford
704 N.E.2d 1237 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 N.E.2d 1254, 46 Ohio St. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-morford-ohio-1989.