Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore

886 A.2d 666
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
DocketNo. 1071 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 886 A.2d 666 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore, 886 A.2d 666 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board and Dissenting Opinion, the Petition for Review and Request for Oral Argument and response thereto, the Request for Oral Argument is denied pursuant to Rule 208(e)(4), Pa.R.D.E., and it is hereby

ORDERED that Richard B. Moore be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
886 A.2d 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-moore-pa-2005.