Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell

74 Ohio St. 3d 616

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 95-2531·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct, but disagree with its recommended sanction. Accordingly, given the gravity of respondent’s crime, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct, but disagree with its recommended sanction. Accordingly, given the gravity of respondent’s crime, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell, 74 Ohio St. 3d 616 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

74 Ohio St. 3d 616 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related