Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 07-NOV-2018 09:37 AM SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
In re: Application for the Reinstatement of
JANET CLARE MILLER
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 10-006-8840)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Mckenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon review of Respondent Janet Clare Miller’s October 18, 2018 petition for reinstatement, and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Miller is reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction, effective upon entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Miller shall contact the Hawai#i State Bar Association prior to her resumption of practice to ensure that she is in compliance with Rule 17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i governing administrative registration of licensed attorneys in this jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 7, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-miller-haw-2018.