Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

699 N.E.2d 458, 83 Ohio St. 3d 222
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 23, 1998
DocketNo. 98-712
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 699 N.E.2d 458 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros, 699 N.E.2d 458, 83 Ohio St. 3d 222 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for eighteen months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meros v. Mazgaj, Unpublished Decision (4-30-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
Meros v. Rorapaugh, Unpublished Decision (11-22-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Meros
2000 Ohio 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros
1998 Ohio 522 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 N.E.2d 458, 83 Ohio St. 3d 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-meros-ohio-1998.