Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

699 N.E.2d 458, 83 Ohio St. 3d 222
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 1998·No. No. 98-712·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for eighteen months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros, 699 N.E.2d 458, 83 Ohio St. 3d 222 (Ohio 1998).

699 N.E.2d 458 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meros v. Mazgaj, Unpublished Decision (4-30-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
Meros v. Rorapaugh, Unpublished Decision (11-22-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Meros
2000 Ohio 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros
1998 Ohio 522 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)