Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon

597 N.E.2d 85, 64 Ohio St. 3d 460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1902
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 2, 1992·No. No. 92-419·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules, as found by the board. We also concur with the board’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon, 597 N.E.2d 85, 64 Ohio St. 3d 460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1902 (Ohio 1992).

597 N.E.2d 85 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Allen
700 N.E.2d 682 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1997)
Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon
655 N.E.2d 734 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)