Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKnight

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKnight

806 A.2d 854

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 4, 2002

DocketNo. 93 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 806 A.2d 854 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKnight, 806 A.2d 854 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2002, upon consideration of the contention of respondent pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa. R.D.E., that he is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 154 DB 2001, it is hereby

ORDERED that Anthony Jerome McKnight, who was suspended for a period of one year and one day by Order of this Court dated April 2, 2001, shall remain under suspension until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Ail pending disciplinary proceedings shall meanwhile be held in abeyance except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2002, upon consideration of the contention of respondent pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa. R.D.E., that he is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 154 DB 2001, it is hereby

ORDERED that Anthony Jerome McKnight, who was suspended for a period of one year and one day by Order of this Court dated April 2, 2001, shall remain under suspension until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Ail pending disciplinary proceedings shall meanwhile be held in abeyance except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 A.2d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-mcknight-pa-2002.