Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath

642 N.E.2d 370, 71 Ohio St. 3d 131

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1994·No. No. 94-1866·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. While we agree with the two-year suspension and conditions recommended by the board, we stay only one year of said suspension, and thereafter place respondent on a one-year monitored probation. The conditions, as recommended by the board, shall apply during the full two-year suspension and probationary period. If respondent violates any of the conditions outlined by the board during the period of his probation, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically reimposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. While we agree with the two-year suspension and conditions recommended by the board, we stay only one year of said suspension, and thereafter place respondent on a one-year monitored probation. The conditions, as recommended by the board, shall apply during the full two-year suspension and probationary period. If respondent violates any of the conditions outlined by the board during the period of his probation, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically reimposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath, 642 N.E.2d 370, 71 Ohio St. 3d 131 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

642 N.E.2d 370 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related