Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald
This text of 646 N.E.2d 819 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have reviewed the record in this case and agree that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(4), (5), and (6), 3 — 101(B), and 9 — 102(B)(1). However, we cannot concur in the recommendation to impose further disciplinary measures where previous sanctions have been ignored with relative impunity. Therefore, we order that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
646 N.E.2d 819, 71 Ohio St. 3d 628, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-mcdonald-ohio-1995.