Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
668 N.E.2d 478, 76 Ohio St. 3d 481, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 619
Opinion
We adopt the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the suspension stayed on condition that respondent attend a minimum of six hours of Continuing Legal Education classes dealing with law office management in addition to his normal CLE obligation, and that he be on probation with the local bar association for a year or until the condition is met, whichever is longer. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer, 668 N.E.2d 478, 76 Ohio St. 3d 481, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 619 (Ohio 1996).
668 N.E.2d 478 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Davis
2012 Ohio 4546 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
748 N.E.2d 1136 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Rogers
1999 Ohio 338 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Webster
705 A.2d 1135 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
1996 Ohio 378 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)