Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio

725 N.E.2d 1111, 88 Ohio St. 3d 324
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 2000
DocketNo. 99-1865
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 725 N.E.2d 1111 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio, 725 N.E.2d 1111, 88 Ohio St. 3d 324 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundbeug Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio
2000 Ohio 341 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
725 N.E.2d 1111, 88 Ohio St. 3d 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-mascio-ohio-2000.