Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-16-0000523 05-JAN-2017 SCAD-16-0000523 01:17 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
WILLIAM T. MARTINEZ, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case No. 15-034-9253)
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the December 20, 2016 affidavit submitted by Respondent William T. Martinez and the record, it appears Respondent Martinez has complied with the terms of his suspension. We further note Respondent Martinez has averred he intends to comply in a timely manner with the requirement he pay $2,417.00 in restitution to his former client. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.17(b), Respondent Martinez is reinstated to the practice of law in the jurisdiction of the State of Hawai#i, effective upon entry of this order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 5, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-martinez-haw-2017.