Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin

633 N.E.2d 1112, 69 Ohio St. 3d 468
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 22, 1994
DocketNo. 94-492
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 633 N.E.2d 1112 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin, 633 N.E.2d 1112, 69 Ohio St. 3d 468 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings and recommendation, except for the proposed credit for respondent’s interim suspension. Therefore, we find that Linda Sue Martin violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6), and she is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the last six months of that period to be stayed in favor of the probation period and conditions recommended by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin
644 N.E.2d 1024 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin
1994 Ohio 105 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 N.E.2d 1112, 69 Ohio St. 3d 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-martin-ohio-1994.