Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel

739 N.E.2d 299, 90 Ohio St. 3d 401
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 13, 2000
DocketNo. 00-1108
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 739 N.E.2d 299 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel, 739 N.E.2d 299, 90 Ohio St. 3d 401 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel
2000 Ohio 98 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
739 N.E.2d 299, 90 Ohio St. 3d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-mandel-ohio-2000.