Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin

628 N.E.2d 1356, 68 Ohio St. 3d 482
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 23, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1739
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 628 N.E.2d 1356 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin, 628 N.E.2d 1356, 68 Ohio St. 3d 482 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin
722 N.E.2d 518 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin
2000 Ohio 251 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 N.E.2d 1356, 68 Ohio St. 3d 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-malkin-ohio-1994.