Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

782 N.E.2d 1161, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1205

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 22, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-0325

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 782 N.E.2d 1161 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi, 782 N.E.2d 1161, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1205 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Marcus M. Lombardi, Attorney Registration No. 0042349, last known business address in Akron, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 3, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with 18 months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Marcus M. Lombardi be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for' in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi, 96 Ohio St.3d 54, 2002-Ohio-2990, 770 N.E.2d 1013.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI