Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon

625 N.E.2d 602, 68 Ohio St. 3d 202
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1712
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 625 N.E.2d 602 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon, 625 N.E.2d 602, 68 Ohio St. 3d 202 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the final year of the suspension stayed for a probationary period of two years, if during this period the respondent receives continuing treatment from a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist such as Dr. Siddall. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. [205]*205Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hill v. Niehaus
1994 Ohio 45 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 N.E.2d 602, 68 Ohio St. 3d 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-leyshon-ohio-1994.