Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leslie-Hughes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leslie-Hughes

589 A.2d 204, 527 Pa. 130, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 103

DecidedApril 30, 1991

DocketNo. 487 Disciplinary Docket No. 2, Disciplinary Board No. 61 DB 85, No. 385 Disciplinary Docket No. 2 and Disciplinary Board No. 62 DB 81

StatusPublished

This text of 589 A.2d 204 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leslie-Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leslie-Hughes, 589 A.2d 204, 527 Pa. 130, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 103 (Pa. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 1991, the Rule to Show Cause entered in the above matter on March 30,1990, is discharged. The recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated March 27, 1989, is accepted, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years retroactive to July 30, 1985, less one year for suspension served;

2. The Petition for Reinstatement is granted, effective immediately; and

3. Pursuant to Rules 208(g) and 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., David H. Leslie-Hughes is directed to pay the expenses incurred [131]*131by the Board in the investigation, prosecution and processing of these proceedings.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI