Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leeth

537 N.E.2d 223, 42 Ohio St. 3d 97, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 39
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1989·No. No. D.D. 88-32·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and its recommendations. Accordingly, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leeth, 537 N.E.2d 223, 42 Ohio St. 3d 97, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 39 (Ohio 1989).

537 N.E.2d 223 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)