Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence

668 N.E.2d 921, 76 Ohio St. 3d 1222, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2758

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 7, 1996

DocketNo. 95-371

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 N.E.2d 921 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence, 668 N.E.2d 921, 76 Ohio St. 3d 1222, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2758 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, David Alan Lawrence, Attorney Registration No. 0015293, last known address in Euclid, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of July 5,1995, wherein pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B), the court suspended respondent for one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that David Alan Lawrence be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 420, 650 N.E.2d 867.

Mover, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI