Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-10-0000039 01-FEB-2011 10:28 AM
SCAD-10-0000039
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
RONALD D.S. LAU, Respondent.
(ODC 08-075-8718)
ORDER CONTINUING SUSPENSION
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and
Circuit Judge Castagnetti, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel’s “Report to the Supreme Court Concerning the Cooperation
of Respondent and Recommendation that the Suspension not be
Vacated,” the memorandum, exhibits, and affidavits in support
thereof, Respondent Lau’s lack of response thereto, and the
record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the suspension order entered
on November 24, 2010, shall remain in effect until further order
of this court.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 1, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-lau-haw-2011.