Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 24, 2010
DocketSCAD-10-0000039
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau, (haw 2010).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-10-0000039 24-NOV-2010 01:54 PM

SCAD-10-0000039

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

RONALD D.S. LAU, Respondent.

(ODC 08-075-8718)

ORDER OF SUSPENSION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Castagnetti, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary

Counsel’s petition for the immediate suspension of Respondent

Ronald D.S. Lau from the practice of law for failure to cooperate

with a disciplinary investigation, the memorandum and exhibits in

support thereof, the record, and Respondent Lau’s response to our

October 21, 2010, order to appear and show cause, it appears that

Respondent Lau is the subject of a disciplinary investigation and

has failed to cooperate with the investigation. Respondent Lau

appears to assert that he is now willing to cooperate, but

requests diversion to the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance

Program. Respondent Lau does not need a court order to seek the services of the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance Program, and

the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance Program is not a substitute

for cooperating with a disciplinary investigation. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.12A of the

Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i, that

Respondent Lau is suspended from the practice of law. This order

is effective immediately and until further order of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Lau’s request for

diversion to the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance Program is

denied, without prejudice to Respondent Lau’s voluntary

participation in the program. See Rule 16.4 of the Rules of the

Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Office of Disciplinary

Counsel shall report to this court within 30 days after entry of

this order whether Respondent Lau has cooperated with the

investigation and shall recommend whether this suspension order

should be vacated.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 24, 2010.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-lau-haw-2010.