Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-10-0000039 24-NOV-2010 01:54 PM
SCAD-10-0000039
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
RONALD D.S. LAU, Respondent.
(ODC 08-075-8718)
ORDER OF SUSPENSION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Castagnetti, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel’s petition for the immediate suspension of Respondent
Ronald D.S. Lau from the practice of law for failure to cooperate
with a disciplinary investigation, the memorandum and exhibits in
support thereof, the record, and Respondent Lau’s response to our
October 21, 2010, order to appear and show cause, it appears that
Respondent Lau is the subject of a disciplinary investigation and
has failed to cooperate with the investigation. Respondent Lau
appears to assert that he is now willing to cooperate, but
requests diversion to the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance
Program. Respondent Lau does not need a court order to seek the services of the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance Program, and
the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance Program is not a substitute
for cooperating with a disciplinary investigation. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.12A of the
Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i, that
Respondent Lau is suspended from the practice of law. This order
is effective immediately and until further order of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Lau’s request for
diversion to the Attorneys’ and Judges’ Assistance Program is
denied, without prejudice to Respondent Lau’s voluntary
participation in the program. See Rule 16.4 of the Rules of the
Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel shall report to this court within 30 days after entry of
this order whether Respondent Lau has cooperated with the
investigation and shall recommend whether this suspension order
should be vacated.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 24, 2010.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-lau-haw-2010.