Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash
623 N.E.2d 28, 68 Ohio St. 3d 12
Opinion
We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered to serve a one-year suspension from the practice of law in Ohio, with such suspension to have begun on February 19, 1992. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash, 623 N.E.2d 28, 68 Ohio St. 3d 12 (Ohio 1993).
623 N.E.2d 28 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Wagner
2013 Ohio 5087 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
In Re Neisner
2010 VT 102 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Malley
2010 Ohio 3802 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger
2010 Ohio 1830 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis
870 N.E.2d 1158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield
846 N.E.2d 45 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
In re Concemi
662 N.E.2d 1030 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash
625 N.E.2d 617 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)