Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lanuti

628 A.2d 840, 534 Pa. 254, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 29, 1993
DocketNo. 934 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board No. 42
StatusPublished

This text of 628 A.2d 840 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lanuti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lanuti, 628 A.2d 840, 534 Pa. 254, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 184 (Pa. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 1993, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on May 17, 1993, and no properly filed response having been received, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Rule is made absolute and respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.;

3. Within thirty days hereof, respondent shall return files, evidence and other property of clients in his possession to the clients to whom they belong, either directly, to designated successor counsel or through the Office of Disciplinary Counsel as intermediary.

[255]*2554. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may be necessary to protect fully the rights and interests of respondent’s clients.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 A.2d 840, 534 Pa. 254, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-lanuti-pa-1993.