Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Landry
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Landry (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Landry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-16-0000112 23-JAN-2017 07:50 AM
SCAD-16-0000112
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,
Petitioner,
vs.
THOMAS ALFRED LANDRY,
Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(ODC 7939.P1)
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon review of Respondent Thomas A. Landry’s January 4,
2017 petition for reinstatement, and the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Landry is
reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction, effective
upon entry of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Landry shall
contact the Hawai'i State Bar Association prior to his resumption
of practice to ensure he is in compliance with Rule 17 of the
Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, governing
administrative registration of licensed attorneys in this
jurisdiction.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 23, 2017.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Landry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-landry-haw-2017.