Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kral

737 N.E.2d 956, 90 Ohio St. 3d 298
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 8, 2000
DocketNo. 00-784
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 N.E.2d 956 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kral, 737 N.E.2d 956, 90 Ohio St. 3d 298 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in ' Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kral
2000 Ohio 77 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 N.E.2d 956, 90 Ohio St. 3d 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-kral-ohio-2000.