Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury

552 N.E.2d 941, 50 Ohio St. 3d 150, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 168
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1990·No. No. 89-2169·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Respondent’s suspension shall commence on the date of this decision. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Resnick, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury, 552 N.E.2d 941, 50 Ohio St. 3d 150, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 168 (Ohio 1990).

552 N.E.2d 941 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cantrell
2010 Ohio 2114 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury
739 N.E.2d 804 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury
1997 Ohio 99 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart
1996 Ohio 121 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart
661 N.E.2d 1062 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Disciplinary Counsel v. DiCarlantonio
1994 Ohio 144 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)