Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Konet

532 N.E.2d 1313, 40 Ohio St. 3d 256, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 455
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1988·No. No. D.D. 88-20·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court concurs in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having committed the described misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Konet, 532 N.E.2d 1313, 40 Ohio St. 3d 256, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 455 (Ohio 1988).

532 N.E.2d 1313 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Konet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related